
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE (KOK press release)
It's curious that in an international engineering meeting, English is the accepted language. What's not accepted, however, are the units of measure on the equipment under discussion. Engineering units still cause difficulties in the global interchange of parts and data.
All countries are now in
various degrees of transitions to the metric system. Most of the EU countries are
nearly completely metric whereas other countries such as UK, Canada, India and
Australia are about half way. In comparison, the USA may be about 20% metric.
Many of our products and industries have been metric for quite some time, while automotive
companies have been in this transition process for more than 20 years.
Changing to the metric system presents an opportunity for companies to unify metric
standards worldwide and encourage the use of more interchangeable parts. These can be
mass produced in fewer variety which benefit consumers and producers alike.
To make more parts interchangeable, other factors must also be interchangeable, such as the nominal size of a part, its tolerances, and material quality. A bolt, for example, must have the same physical size, tolerance, and strength class. Steel plates are interchangeable when the thickness, size, tolerance, and the steel quality are sufficiently close to swapping one manufacturer to another. More importantly, purchasing interchangeable parts and components around the world provides an opportunity to reduce manufacturing costs.
The preferred numbering system has played a major role in the development of metric standards. This is a geometrical series of numbers adopted worldwide. Its first known application was in the 1870s by Charles Renard, a French army captain who reduced the different diameters of rope for military balloons from 425 to 17. The R5, R10 and R20 series refers to the Renard 5 (first choice sizes 60 % increments), Renard 10 (second choice sizes 25 % increments) and Renard 20 (third choice sizes 12 % increments) series of preferred numbers standardized in ANSI Z17.1 and ISO 3.
Nominal metric sizes are identical where the metric system has been in use for several years. Here is how the preferred metric nominal sizes were developed and how these chosen sizes reflect preferred metric standard sizes for threaded fasteners, steel plates, sheets, bars, etc already in use throughout the world.
How do the preferred metric sizes relate to the customary inch sizes and the preferred numbers are shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1 Preferred Size Selection | ||||||||
|
Preferred Size mm | Preferred | Size Inch | Preferred Numbers | |||||
First | Second | Third | mm | Fractions | Decimals | First | Second | Third |
Choice | Choice | Choice | Choice | Choice | Choice | |||
4 |
3.97 | 5/32 | 0.156 | 4 | ||||
4.5 | 4.37 | 11/64 | 0.172 |
4.5 | ||||
5 | 4.76 | 3/16 | 0.188 | 5 | ||||
5.5 | 5.56 | 7/32 | 0.219 |
5.6 | ||||
6 |
6.35 | 1/4 | 0.25 | 6.3 | ||||
7 | 7.14 | 9/32 | 0.281 |
7.1 | ||||
8 | 7.94 | 5/16 | 0.313 | 8 | ||||
9 | 8.73 | 11/32 | 0.344 |
9 | ||||
10 |
9.53 | 3/8 | 0.375 | 10 | ||||
11 | 11.11 | 7/16 | 0.438 |
11.2 | ||||
12 | 12.7 | 1/2 | 0.5 | 12.5 | ||||
14 | 14.29 | 9/16 | 0.563 |
14 | ||||
16 |
15.88 | 5/8 | 0.625 | 16 | ||||
18 | 17.46 | 11/16 | 0.688 |
18 | ||||
20 | 19.05 | 3/4 | 0.75 | 20 | ||||
22 | 22.23 | 7/8 | 0.875 |
22.4 | ||||
25 |
25.4 | 1 | 25 | |||||
28 | 28.58 | 1 1/8 | 1.125 |
28 | ||||
30 | 30.16 | 1 3/16 | 1.188 | 31.5 | ||||
35 | 34.93 | 1 3/8 | 1.375 |
35.5 | ||||
40 |
39.69 | 1 9/16 | 1.563 | 40 | ||||
GO | STOP | CAUTION | ||||||
The ANSI preferred metric sizes are identical to those in the ISO 497 R"20 rounded series selected years ago. The intent of the number series shown is to reduce the number of standard sizes for screw threads, steel plates, steel sheets, round steel bars, lifting capacities, hydraulic cylinder diameters, etc.
The preferred size range from 4 through 40 millimeters may be extended to cover smaller or larger sizes by just multiplying or dividing sizes shown by 10. For instance, 60-mm sizes would be a preferred choice as would 2.5-mm devices.
For example, the eleven first choice fastener sizes shown in Figure 2 are all metric coarse thread. They are recommended to replace the 53 other thread sizes listed. Furthermore, the four sizes shown in bold are according to the R5 series of preferred sizes shown in Figure 1. The cost reduction becomes substantial when you figure thousands of dollars savings for each unique fastener size that can be eliminated from the product design.
Figure 2 Screw Threads | |||||
|
ISO 262 Metric | Unified Inch | ||||
Coarse | Fine | Coarse | Fine | ||
First | Second | mm | mm | Inch | |
Choice | Choice | ||||
M3 |
2.8 | #4-40 | #4-48 | ||
3.2 | #5-40 | #5-44 | |||
M3.5 | 3.5 | #6-32 | #6-40 | ||
M4 | 4.2 | #8-32 | #8-36 | ||
M4.5 | 4.8 | #10-24 | #10-32 | ||
M5 |
5.5 | #12-24 | #12-28 | ||
M6 |
6.3 | 1/4-20 | 1/4-28 | ||
M8 |
M8x1 | 7.9 | 5/16-18 | 5/16-24 | |
M10 | M10x1.25 | 9.5 | 3/8-16 | 3/8-24 | |
10.9 | 7/16-14 | 7/16-20 | |||
M12 | M12x1.25 | 12.7 | 1/2-13 | 1/2-20 | |
M14 | M14x1.5 | 14.3 | 9/16-12 | 9/16-18 | |
M16 | M16x1.5 | 15.9 | 5/8-11 | 5/8-18 | |
M18 | M18x1.5 | ||||
|
M20 | M20x1.5 | 19.1 | 3/4-10 | 3/4-16 | |
M22 | M22x1.5 | 22.2 | 7/8-9 | 7/8-14 | |
M24 | M24x2 | 25.4 | 1.0-8 | 1.0-12 | |
M27 | M27x2 | 28.6 | 1 1/8-7 | 1 1/8-12 | |
M30 | M30x2 | 31.8 | 1 1/4-7 | 1 1/4-12 | |
GO | CAUTION | STOP | |||
The metric coarse thread pitch is slightly smaller (finer) compared to the customary unified coarse thread pitch. For example; the metric coarse thread M8 has the thread pitch 1.25 mm and the inch thread 5/16 18 has the thread pitch 1.41 mm.
Preferred metric, standard metric and customary inch steel plate sizes are shown in Figure 3. It is recommended selections be made from the preferred metric column marked first and second choice. Selection of first choice sizes will further reduce the number of plate sizes from eight to four. This is a huge cost reduction compared with the 19 inch plate sizes that used to be stocked by a large USA company.
Figure 3 Steel Plates |
|||||||
|
Preferred Metric | Customary Inch | ||||||
ANSI B32.3 | First | Second | |||||
First | Second | Third | First | Second | Choice | Choice | |
Choice | Choice | Choice | Choice | Choice | mm | Inch | |
5 | 5 | 4.76 | 3/16 | ||||
5.5 | 5.5 | 5.56 | 7/32 | ||||
|
6 | 6 |
6.35 | 1/4 | ||||
7 | 7 | 7.14 | 9/32 | ||||
8 | 8 | 7.9 | 5/16 | ||||
9 | 9 | 8.73 | 11/32 | ||||
|
10 | 10 |
9.5 | 3/8 | ||||
10.3 | 13/32 | ||||||
11 | 11 | 10.9 | 7/16 | ||||
|
12 | 12 | 11.9 | 15/32 | ||||
12.7 | 1/2 | ||||||
14 | 14 | 14.3 | 9/16 | ||||
|
16 | 16 |
15.9 | 5/8 | ||||
18 | 18 | 17.5 | 11/16 | ||||
19.1 | 3/4 | ||||||
|
20 | 20 | 20.6 | 13/16 | ||||
|
22 | 22 | 22.2 | 7/8 | ||||
23.8 | 15/16 | ||||||
25 |
25 | 25.4 | 1 | ||||
GO | CAUTION | STOP | |||||
You probably do not have to reduce the numbers of ropes used to hold balloons , but the Renard series of sizes gives you a great tool to help cut cost in manufacturing.
ISO
tolerancing standards offer industry a savings opportunity. New software
programs make those standards more easily available and can maximize those opportunities
and save time as well. Rating basic sizes and tolerances helps reduce the number of hole and
shaft sizes specified.
Hole basis fits with hole tolerances identified by ANSI and ISO as H11, H9, H8 and H7 help rationalize on standard cutting tools and gages, whereas shaft basis fits with shaft tolerances h11, h9, h7 and h6 help rationalize on standard round steel bars available in all major industrial countries. See Figure 4.
Figure 4 Round Cold Finished Steel Bars | ||||||||
Country | National Standard | ISO Product Tolerance | Other ISO Shaft | |||||
Tolerances | ||||||||
Global | ISO 1829* | h11 | h9 | h7 | h6 | h5, h8 | ||
USA | ANSI B4.2* | h11 | h9 | h7 | h6 | |||
Japan | JIS G3123 | h11 | h9 | h7 | h6 | h13, h12, h10, h8 | ||
Germany | DIN 668 |
h11 | ||||||
DIN 669,671 | h9 | |||||||
|
DIN 59360 | h7 | |||||||
DIN 59361 |
h6 | |||||||
DIN 670 | h8 | |||||||
France | NF A47-411 | h11 | h9 |
h10 | ||||
NF A47-461 | ||||||||
UK | BS 4500* | h11 | h9 | h7 | h6 | |||
Italy | UNI 468 |
h11 | ||||||
|
UNI 469 | h9 | |||||||
|
UNI 5953 | h7 | |||||||
|
Australia | AS 1654* | h11 | h9 | h7 | h6 | |||
|
*This is a preferred tolerance standard and not a steel product standard |
||||||||
GO | CAUTION | |||||||
The ANSI standard and software have ten preferred hole and shaft basis fits ranging from LOOSE RUNNING to FORCE fits shown in Figure 5. It is recommended you use shaft basis fits in most applications since it helps you reduce the cost of cutting tools and gages. However, it may be to your advantage to use shaft basis fits where you have a standard shaft size in the machine with bearings, couplings, sprockets, gears, and other components attached to it. Examples include knitting , printing , and farm machines.
Each preferred fit has the same clearance or interference for hole or shaft basis fit listed on the same line.
Figure 5 Preferred Fits | ||||||||
Hole | Shaft | Description | ||||||
Basis | Basis | |||||||
H11/c11 | C11/h11 | LOOSE RUNNING | fit for wide commercial tolerances or | |||||
allowances on external members. | ||||||||